Skip to main content
Springer Publishing
Site Menu
  • Browse by subjectSubjectsBrowse by subject
    • Medicine
    • Nursing
    • Physician Assistant
    • Behavioral Sciences
    • Health Sciences
  • What we publish
    • Books
    • Journals
    • Reference
  • Information forInformationInformation for
    • Students
    • Educators
    • Institutions
    • Authors
    • Societies
    • Advertisers
  • About
  • Help
  •   0 items You have 0 items in your shopping cart. Click to view details.   My account
Springer Publishing
  My account

Main navigation

Main Navigation

  • Browse by subjectSubjectsBrowse by subject
    • Medicine
    • Nursing
    • Physician Assistant
    • Behavioral Sciences
    • Health Sciences
  • What we publish
    • Books
    • Journals
    • Reference
  • Information forInformationInformation for
    • Students
    • Educators
    • Institutions
    • Authors
    • Societies
    • Advertisers

Secondary Navigation

  •   0 items You have 0 items in your shopping cart. Click to view details.
  • About
  • Help
 filters 

Your search for all content returned 8 results

Include content types...

    • Reference Work 0
    • Quick Reference 0
    • Procedure 0
    • Prescribing Guideline 0
    • Patient Education 0
    • Journals 0
    • Journal Articles 6
    • Clinical Guideline 0
    • Books 0
    • Book Chapters 2

Filter results by...

Filter by keyword

    • evidence-based practice
    • feeling-state
    • breastfeeding 66
    • BREASTFEEDING 48
    • lactation 32
    • Blood Cell Count 28
    • complete blood count 27
    • Physical Examination 26
    • physical examination 24
    • Ultrasonography 22
    • Radiography 20
    • Blood Culture 19
    • Sleep 19
    • Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders 19
    • blood cultures 18
    • Anti-Infective Agents 17
    • antimicrobial therapy 16
    • Lewy body dementia 16
    • Lewy Body Disease 16
    • Data Interpretation, Statistical 15
    • Statistics 15
    • Anti-Bacterial Agents 14
    • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy 14
    • radiography 14
    • Clinical Trial 12
    • Data Collection 12
    • Research Design 12
    • Diaries as Topic 11
    • insomnia 11
    • Musculoskeletal Diseases 11
    • Research Personnel 11
    • tongue-tie 11
    • ultrasound 11
    • Practice Guideline 10
    • transducer 10
    • Transducers 10
    • anatomic region 9
    • clinical practice 9
    • data collection 9
    • Pathology 9
    • sleep diary 9
    • sleep therapy 9
    • antibiotic therapy 8
    • Biomedical Research 8
    • CLINICAL LACTATION 8
    • evidence-based practice 8
    • musculoskeletal problems 8
    • Musculoskeletal System 8
    • Radiology 8
    • Statistics, Nonparametric 8
    • Brain 7
    • DNP 7
  • evidence-based practice
  • feeling-state

Filter by author

    • Seel, Ronald T. 2
    • Bargad, Adena 1
    • Blok, Robert 1
    • Corsaro, Maria 1
    • Fugate, Stephanie R. 1
    • Johnson, Paul M. 1
    • Lewis, C. Preston 1
    • McEneaney, Mary-Jane 1
    • Richardson, Luann G. 1
    • Roberts, Bridget R. 1
    • Snyder, Kenneth 1
    • Tanabe, Paula 1
    • Titch, James F. 1
    • Walter, Thomas R. 1
    • Zuzul, Marcia A. 1

Filter by book / journal title

    • Clinical Scholars Review 6
    • Handbook for Clinical Research: Design, Statistics, and Implementation 2

Filter by subject

    • Other Specialties
    • Medicine 14
      • Neurology 1
        • Exam Prep and Study Tools 0
      • Oncology 5
        • Medical Oncology 1
        • Radiation Oncology 2
        • Exam Prep and Study Tools 0
      • Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 5
        • Exam Prep and Study Tools 0
      • Other Specialties 8
    • Nursing 278
      • Administration, Management, and Leadership 73
      • Advanced Practice 122
        • Critical Care, Acute Care, and Emergency 1
        • Family and Adult-Gerontology Primary Care 9
        • Pediatrics and Neonatal 50
        • Women's Health, Obstetrics, and Midwifery 18
        • Other 8
      • Clinical Nursing 8
      • Critical Care, Acute Care, and Emergency 60
      • Geriatrics and Gerontology 5
      • Doctor of Nursing Practice 57
      • Nursing Education 69
      • Professional Issues and Trends 45
      • Research, Theory, and Measurement 81
      • Undergraduate Nursing 29
      • Special Topics 11
      • Exam Prep and Study Tools 7
    • Physician Assistant 8
    • Behavioral Sciences 63
      • Counseling 31
        • General Counseling 0
        • Marriage and Family Counseling 5
        • Mental Health Counseling 13
        • Rehabilitation Counseling 3
        • School Counseling 1
        • Exam Prep and Study Tools 3
      • Gerontology 2
        • Adult Development and Aging 0
        • Biopsychosocial 0
        • Global and Comparative Aging 0
        • Research 0
        • Service and Program Development 0
        • Exam Prep and Study Tools 0
      • Psychology 27
        • Applied Psychology 6
        • Clinical and Counseling Psychology 10
        • Cognitive, Biological, and Neurological Psychology 10
        • Developmental Psychology 4
        • General Psychology 0
        • School and Educational Psychology 2
        • Social and Personality Psychology 12
        • Exam Prep and Study Tools 0
      • Social Work 25
        • Administration and Management 0
        • Policy, Social Justice, and Human Rights 11
        • Theory, Practice, and Skills 14
        • Exam Prep and Study Tools 0
    • Health Sciences 6
      • Health Care Administration and Management 2
      • Public Health 6
  • Other Specialties
Include options
Please enter years in the form YYYY
  • Save search

Your search for all content returned 8 results

Order by: Relevance | Title | Date
  • Recommendations for Reporting Research StudiesGo to chapter: Recommendations for Reporting Research Studies

    Recommendations for Reporting Research Studies

    Chapter

    This chapter describes checklists that summarize recommendations for reporting treatment, observational, diagnostic, and prognostic studies, as well as systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This checklists were developed by organizations and work groups who specialize in research methodology and are public access. Use of evidence-based checklists with recommendations for appropriate reporting of research studies can enhance the information available to systematic reviewers who rate the quality of evidence. The CONsolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Statement 2010 for reporting clinical trials enables readers to understand a trial’s design, analysis, and interpretation, and assess the validity of the study’s results. The STAndards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) initiative for reporting diagnostic validity studies aims to improve the accuracy of reported research design elements, sampling methods, and data analyses in diagnostic studies. Successful use of checklists presupposes an understanding of experimental research designs, and the threats to the validity of causal inferences.

    Source:
    Handbook for Clinical Research: Design, Statistics, and Implementation
  • Developing and Evaluating Systematic Reviews and Practice GuidelinesGo to chapter: Developing and Evaluating Systematic Reviews and Practice Guidelines

    Developing and Evaluating Systematic Reviews and Practice Guidelines

    Chapter

    This chapter focuses on the most common systems that rehabilitation systematic review (SR) and guideline development (GD) groups use to evaluate evidence from clinical trials and form clinical practice recommendations. Use of evidence rating and practice GD systems is essential to implementing evidence-based practice (EBP). Evidence rating and practice GD systems can also be used proactively to improve the development of future evidence by helping researchers to proactively select research design elements that best minimize validity threats in clinical trials. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has published standards for conducting SRs and developing practice guidelines that have had broad influence on all health care fields and disciplines. Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Work Group (GRADE) pro computer software is available to facilitate SR and GD. In general, the GRADE system provides a more detailed process for generating usable practice recommendations.

    Source:
    Handbook for Clinical Research: Design, Statistics, and Implementation
  • Evidence Principles: Caveats in Translation of Probability and RiskGo to article: Evidence Principles: Caveats in Translation of Probability and Risk

    Evidence Principles: Caveats in Translation of Probability and Risk

    Article

    There is little doubt that evidence-based principles have changed the way we think about clinical practice. However, there are challenges to clinical decision making that evidence alone cannot answer. Challenges include realities such as research populations not reflecting “real-world” application, inconsistent adherence to evidence-based principles within clinical practices, sophisticated decision rules overshadowing clinical experience, and gaps in care that impact outcomes. This article attempts first to demonstrate caveats of using and interpreting evidence-based principles and, second, to illustrate common evidence-based concepts which many clinicians misunderstand. These include the cascade effect, common risk difference measures, and predictive values.

    Source:
    Clinical Scholars Review
  • Knowledge Development: Building on a Solid FoundationGo to article: Knowledge Development: Building on a Solid Foundation

    Knowledge Development: Building on a Solid Foundation

    Article

    Knowledge development is critical for the enhancement of evidence-based nursing practice and the overall delivery of care to obtain superior clinical outcomes. Nursing scholars have built on Carper’s (1975, 1978) fundamental patterns of knowing to improve nursing practice over the last 40 years and is still used today. Doctor of nursing practice (DNP) professionals should understand the various patterns of knowledge development and the implications provided for transforming health care models and systems in the clinical setting.

    Source:
    Clinical Scholars Review
  • Improving Preoperative Cardiac Assessment Efficiency by Using the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines: A Quality Improvement ProjectGo to article: Improving Preoperative Cardiac Assessment Efficiency by Using the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines: A Quality Improvement Project

    Improving Preoperative Cardiac Assessment Efficiency by Using the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines: A Quality Improvement Project

    Article

    Background: Patients undergoing noncardiac surgery can experience cardiac complications, which are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the perioperative period. The goal of this quality improvement (QI) project was to standardize the preoperative assessment process and improve patient-centered care by implementing evidence-based practice guidelines for electrocardiogram (ECG) recommendations prior to noncardiac surgery. Methods: Three steps were used to implement the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) recommendation for ECG to reduce variance in practice and decrease surgical cancellations. A pre- and postdesign was used to evaluate 2 outcomes: decreased surgical cancellations for lack of a current ECG and surgical loss opportunity cost. All data were retrospectively collected for 60 days during the pre- and postperiods. Results: Evidence-based, preoperative ECG recommendations were implemented in the electronic medical record (EMR). Overall, ECG guideline adherence increased from 50% to 66% (χ2 = 2.19, p = .139) postimplementation. Surgical cancellations because of unmet ECG requirements were reduced from 50% to 34% (χ2 = 2.19, p = .139) post-EMR guideline implementation. There was no statistical difference in the cost associated with loss surgical opportunity minutes between the periods (t = 0.79, p = .43, 95% CI [−6.96, 16.24]). Discussion: We successfully implemented an evidence-based guideline recommending specific preoperative ECG requirements within a busy Veterans Administration hospital. This project stimulated ongoing dialogue between the disciplines with positive trends in decreased surgical cancellations.

    Source:
    Clinical Scholars Review
  • Doctor of Nursing Practice: Integrating Theory, Research, and Evidence-Based PracticeGo to article: Doctor of Nursing Practice: Integrating Theory, Research, and Evidence-Based Practice

    Doctor of Nursing Practice: Integrating Theory, Research, and Evidence-Based Practice

    Article

    A strong relationship exists between theory, research, and evidence-based practice; and these three entities are necessary to guide practice and contribute to the body of nursing knowledge. Doctor of nursing practice graduates can serve as leaders as they enter into their respective clinical practice areas. Through education of peers, along with translation and evaluation of current theoretical literature and empirical data, these advanced practice nurses can positively influence nursing practice and patient care.

    Source:
    Clinical Scholars Review
  • The Poster Presentation as Experiential Education: Bridging the Gap Between Research and PracticeGo to article: The Poster Presentation as Experiential Education: Bridging the Gap Between Research and Practice

    The Poster Presentation as Experiential Education: Bridging the Gap Between Research and Practice

    Article

    This article discusses student-prepared poster presentations as an educational tool. The poster presentation exercise is often the beginning of in-depth study, which can ultimately lead to mastery of a particular clinical topic, a presentation at a professional meeting, and/or a publication in a professional journal. As a teaching and educational tool, the poster presentation exercise in advanced practice nursing education provides an opportunity for interactive, experiential learning through the process of “learning by doing,” which unifies personal clinical experience with empirical data and didactic course material.

    Source:
    Clinical Scholars Review
  • Improving Labor Neuraxial Analgesia by Reducing Anesthesia Provider Practice Variance Involving Routine Platelet Counts: A Quantitative Quality Improvement ProjectGo to article: Improving Labor Neuraxial Analgesia by Reducing Anesthesia Provider Practice Variance Involving Routine Platelet Counts: A Quantitative Quality Improvement Project

    Improving Labor Neuraxial Analgesia by Reducing Anesthesia Provider Practice Variance Involving Routine Platelet Counts: A Quantitative Quality Improvement Project

    Article

    For this quality improvement (QI) project, the desired outcomes were the reduction of the incidences of withheld neuraxial analgesia (NA) for healthy parturients and the adoption of evidence-based practice (EBP) by the anesthesia providers (APs). The practice change was designed using the diffusion of innovations in health service organizations change model. The 3 interventions used to achieve the outcomes of the project were (a) revision of the anesthesia service’s standard operating procedure (SOP) to incorporate recent recommendations addressing platelet count limits for parturients, (b) addition of a clinical decision reminder in the patient’s electronic medical record (EMR), and (c) educating obstetrical APs about the new SOP and updated EMR.

    Outcomes were measured using pre- and postimplementation surveys of the staff who work on the labor and delivery ward to evaluate AP practice variance and a modified EBP Implementation Scale to measure the adoption of the evidence by the APs. The QI project was successful in reducing practice variance and resulted in fewer incidences of withheld NA for healthy parturients, and 57.1% of the APs reported changing their practice by adopting the evidence for this project.

    Source:
    Clinical Scholars Review
  • Springer Publishing Company

Our content

  • Books
  • Journals
  • Reference

Information for

  • Students
  • Educators
  • Institutions
  • Authors
  • Societies
  • Advertisers

Company info

  • About
  • Help
  • Permissions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use

© 2022 Springer Publishing Company

Loading