Skip to main content
Springer Publishing
Site Menu
  • Browse by subjectSubjectsBrowse by subject
    • Medicine
    • Nursing
    • Physician Assistant
    • Behavioral Sciences
    • Health Sciences
  • What we publish
    • Books
    • Journals
    • Reference
  • Information forInformationInformation for
    • Students
    • Educators
    • Institutions
    • Authors
    • Societies
    • Advertisers
  • About
  • Help
  •   0 items You have 0 items in your shopping cart. Click to view details.   My account
Springer Publishing
  My account

Main navigation

Main Navigation

  • Browse by subjectSubjectsBrowse by subject
    • Medicine
    • Nursing
    • Physician Assistant
    • Behavioral Sciences
    • Health Sciences
  • What we publish
    • Books
    • Journals
    • Reference
  • Information forInformationInformation for
    • Students
    • Educators
    • Institutions
    • Authors
    • Societies
    • Advertisers

Secondary Navigation

  •   0 items You have 0 items in your shopping cart. Click to view details.
  • About
  • Help
 filters 

Your search for all content returned 13 results

Include content types...

    • Reference Work 0
    • Quick Reference 0
    • Procedure 0
    • Prescribing Guideline 0
    • Patient Education 0
    • Journals 0
    • Journal Articles 13
    • Clinical Guideline 0
    • Books 0
    • Book Chapters 0

Filter results by...

Filter by keyword

    • AGGRESSION 2
    • intimate partner violence 2
    • partner abuse 2
    • psychological aggression 2
    • sexual coercion 2
    • ABUSE 1
    • aggression 1
    • ASSESSMENT FORMAT 1
    • batterer intervention 1
    • batterer intervention program (BIP) standards 1
    • body mass index (BMI) 1
    • conjoint therapy 1
    • couples 1
    • depression 1
    • DEPRESSION 1
    • domestic violence 1
    • DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 1
    • Duluth heterogeneity versus homogeneity 1
    • evidence-based interventions 1
    • FAMILY VIOLENCE 1
    • FEAR 1
    • GENDER 1
    • INJURY 1
    • interpersonal violence 1
    • INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE 1
    • intimate partner violence (IPV) 1
    • jealousy 1
    • marital discord 1
    • mental health 1
    • obesity 1
    • PARTNER ABUSE 1
    • path analysis 1
    • perpetrator treatment 1
    • PHYSICAL ABUSE 1
    • prediction 1
    • PSYCHOLOGICAL ABUSE 1
    • victims 1
    • VIOLENCE 1

Filter by author

    • O’Leary, K. Daniel
    • Wolf, Zane Robinson 38
    • Wolf,, Zane Robinson 37
    • Dryden, Windy 28
    • Jarero, Ignacio 25
    • Tzuriel, David 25
    • Dowd, E. Thomas 24
    • Storch, Eric A. 24
    • Shorey, Ryan C. 23
    • Haywood, H. Carl 22
    • Logan, TK 22
    • Hamel, John 21
    • Mosquera, Dolores 21
    • Leahy, Robert L. 20
    • Maxfield, Louise 19
    • Stuart, Gregory L. 19
    • Hines, Denise A. 18
    • Beck, Aaron T. 16
    • Fernandez, Isabel 16
    • Kozulin, Alex 16
    • Lyddon, William J. 16
    • Riskind, John H. 16
    • Turkel,, Marian C. 16
    • Breggin, Peter R. 15
    • Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Jennifer 15
    • Taylor, Steven 15
    • Dutton, Donald G. 14
    • Hessels, Marco G. P. 14
    • Murphy, Christopher M. 14
    • Ross, Colin A. 14
    • Abramowitz, Jonathan S. 13
    • Friedberg, Robert D. 13
    • Hofmann, Arne 13
    • O’Leary, K. Daniel 13
    • Taft, Casey T. 13
    • Arias, Ileana 12
    • Artigas, Lucina 12
    • Bates, Elizabeth A. 12
    • Boykin,, Anne 12
    • de Jongh, Ad 12
    • Douglas, Emily M. 12
    • Pagani, Marco 12
    • Resick, Patricia A. 12
    • Shapiro, Elan 12
    • Shapiro, Francine 12
    • Stith, Sandra M. 12
    • Taliaferro,, Donna 12
    • Tucker, James A. 12
    • Ullman, Sarah E. 12
    • Alloy, Lauren B. 11
    • Cornelius, Tara L. 11
  • O’Leary, K. Daniel

Filter by book / journal title

    • Violence and Victims 7
    • Partner Abuse 6

Filter by subject

    • Behavioral Sciences
    • Medicine 0
      • Neurology 0
        • Exam Prep and Study Tools 0
      • Oncology 0
        • Medical Oncology 0
        • Radiation Oncology 0
        • Exam Prep and Study Tools 0
      • Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 0
        • Exam Prep and Study Tools 0
      • Other Specialties 0
    • Nursing 0
      • Administration, Management, and Leadership 0
      • Advanced Practice 0
        • Critical Care, Acute Care, and Emergency 0
        • Family and Adult-Gerontology Primary Care 0
        • Pediatrics and Neonatal 0
        • Women's Health, Obstetrics, and Midwifery 0
        • Other 0
      • Clinical Nursing 0
      • Critical Care, Acute Care, and Emergency 0
      • Geriatrics and Gerontology 0
      • Doctor of Nursing Practice 0
      • Nursing Education 0
      • Professional Issues and Trends 0
      • Research, Theory, and Measurement 0
      • Undergraduate Nursing 0
      • Special Topics 0
      • Exam Prep and Study Tools 0
    • Physician Assistant 0
    • Behavioral Sciences 13
      • Counseling 13
        • General Counseling 0
        • Marriage and Family Counseling 13
        • Mental Health Counseling 0
        • Rehabilitation Counseling 0
        • School Counseling 0
        • Exam Prep and Study Tools 0
      • Gerontology 0
        • Adult Development and Aging 0
        • Biopsychosocial 0
        • Global and Comparative Aging 0
        • Research 0
        • Service and Program Development 0
        • Exam Prep and Study Tools 0
      • Psychology 7
        • Applied Psychology 0
        • Clinical and Counseling Psychology 0
        • Cognitive, Biological, and Neurological Psychology 0
        • Developmental Psychology 0
        • General Psychology 0
        • School and Educational Psychology 0
        • Social and Personality Psychology 7
        • Exam Prep and Study Tools 0
      • Social Work 13
        • Administration and Management 0
        • Policy, Social Justice, and Human Rights 13
        • Theory, Practice, and Skills 6
        • Exam Prep and Study Tools 0
    • Health Sciences 0
      • Health Care Administration and Management 0
      • Public Health 0
  • Behavioral Sciences
Include options
Please enter years in the form YYYY
  • Save search

Your search for all content returned 13 results

Order by: Relevance | Title | Date
Show 10 | 50 | 100 per page
  • Sexual Coercion and Psychological Aggression Victimization: Unique Constructs and Predictors of DepressionGo to article: Sexual Coercion and Psychological Aggression Victimization: Unique Constructs and Predictors of Depression

    Sexual Coercion and Psychological Aggression Victimization: Unique Constructs and Predictors of Depression

    Article

    Sexual coercion of women is a common problem in couples that is often conceptualized as a facet of sexual assault or as a form of psychological aggression. Because psychological aggression is consistently linked to depressive symptoms, the researchers evaluated the unique contribution of sexual coercion victimization in the prediction of depressive symptoms beyond the variance explained by psychological aggression victimization. Sample 1 consisted of women living with a partner for at least a year and parenting a young child, whereas Sample 2 consisted of undergraduate students in relationships of at least 6 months. Overall, 27.4% of the women in Sample 1 and 22.8% of the women in Sample 2 reported experiencing sexual coercion victimization. Across both samples, depressive symptoms and psychological aggression victimization were significantly greater in women who experienced sexual coercion victimization. In addition, sexual coercion victimization and psychological aggression victimization each contributed significantly and uniquely to the prediction of depressive symptoms. Thus, although related to psychological aggression victimization, sexual coercion in an intimate relationship is a distinct construct. Implications for assessment, prevention, and couple therapy are discussed.

    Source:
    Partner Abuse
  • The Predictive Utility of Psychological Aggression for Intimate Partner ViolenceGo to article: The Predictive Utility of Psychological Aggression for Intimate Partner Violence

    The Predictive Utility of Psychological Aggression for Intimate Partner Violence

    Article

    Although psychological aggression has been identified as a risk factor for physical aggression, the prevalence of psychological aggression is much higher than that of physical aggression. To further understand the relationship between psychological and physical aggression, the level of psychological aggression at which physical aggression becomes more likely was evaluated. A representative sample of 268 men and 299 women responded anonymously to a self-report measure of aggression (revised Conflict Tactics Scale [CTS-2]) at baseline, and then 1 year later. Using both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses, this study evaluated the level of psychological aggression that is necessary before it is likely that one will be physically aggressive. When one was at the 80th percentile of psychological aggression, there was a 70% probability that a man would be physically aggressive and 85% probability that a woman would be physically aggressive. Longitudinally, when one was at the 80th percentile of psychological aggression at Time 1, there was a 40% probability that a man would be physically aggressive and 45% probability that a woman would be physically aggressive at Time 2. CTS-2 psychological decile scores are provided along with the probability of physical aggression to assist clinicians in interpreting client scores. Implications for research and couples therapy are discussed.

    Source:
    Partner Abuse
  • Emotional Intimacy Mediates the Relationship Between Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration in OEF/OIF/OND VeteransGo to article: Emotional Intimacy Mediates the Relationship Between Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration in OEF/OIF/OND Veterans

    Emotional Intimacy Mediates the Relationship Between Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration in OEF/OIF/OND Veterans

    Article

    Veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are at elevated risk for perpetrating intimate partner violence (IPV). Little research exists on the link between PTSD and physical IPV in Operational Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation New Dawn (OEF/OIF/OND) veterans. A sample of 110 male participants was recruited from the Northport Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC). Three separate models were compared to determine which best explained the relationships between PTSD, IPV, emotional intimacy, and relationship satisfaction. Constructs were assessed via a battery of standardized, self-report instruments. Thirty-three percent of veterans had clinically elevated PTSD scores, and 31% of the men reported that they engaged in physical IPV in the past year. Poor emotional intimacy mediated the association between PTSD symptoms and perpetration of physical IPV. Past predeployment IPV perpetration was shown to be a predictor for current postdeployment physical IPV perpetration.

    Source:
    Violence and Victims
  • One Size Does Not Fit All in Treatment of Intimate Partner ViolenceGo to article: One Size Does Not Fit All in Treatment of Intimate Partner Violence

    One Size Does Not Fit All in Treatment of Intimate Partner Violence

    Article

    A critical examination is needed of the often mandated one-size-fits-all Duluth intervention for male perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV). The underlying philosophy of Duluth-based interventions is evaluated as well as the treatment outcome literature for this intervention. There is very little evidence to justify the current legal system practice of mandating all perpetrators to psychological interventions addressing power and control issues. A literature review of scientific findings with IPV perpetrators and the issues that need to be taken into consideration in developing alternative evidence-based interventions are presented. The evidence seems to favor heterogeneity and not homogeneity with respect to both type of perpetrator and type of violence. Assessment and treatment suggestions are made to address this evidence-based heterogeneity and a call is made to those responsible to stop perpetuating the practice of mandating all perpetrators to attend a single intervention for which there is very limited evidence of effectiveness. About two-thirds of male perpetrators of IPV cease being physically aggressive against their partners if they are assigned to a probation officer, but there is minimal evidence that the addition of a Duluth-based intervention makes perpetration less likely.

    Source:
    Partner Abuse
  • Family of Origin Violence and MCMI-II Psychopathology, Among Partner Assaultive MenGo to article: Family of Origin Violence and MCMI-II Psychopathology, Among Partner Assaultive Men

    Family of Origin Violence and MCMI-II Psychopathology, Among Partner Assaultive Men

    Article

    This study examined associations between family of origin violence, self-reports of psychopathology on the MCMI-II, and current spouse abuse among partner assaultive men. Compared to nonviolent men in discordant (n = 24) and well-adjusted (n = 24) relationships, partner assaultive men (n = 24) were significantly more likely to report childhood histories of physical abuse and physical abuse of the mother in the family of origin. The partner assaultive men also reported significantly higher scores on a variety of MCMI-II personality disorder and Axis I disorder scales. When negative affectivity was controlled, however, batterers differed from contrast groups only on scales assessing antisocial and aggressive characteristics. Within the partner assaultive group, a history of severe childhood abuse was associated with higher scores on a variety of MCMI-II personality disorder and Axis I disorder scales, and higher levels of psychological and physical aggression directed toward the current relationship partner. Abuse of the mother in the family of origin among batterers was associated with higher levels of psychological and physical aggression toward the current partner, but not with self-reported psychopathology. The results support prior descriptions of a batterer subgroup with significant trauma histories, more psychological difficulties, and higher abuse levels than other batterers, suggesting continuities in social and emotional development from childhood maltreatment to adult relationship violence.

    Source:
    Violence and Victims
  • Psychological Abuse: A Variable Deserving Critical Attention in Domestic ViolenceGo to article: Psychological Abuse: A Variable Deserving Critical Attention in Domestic Violence

    Psychological Abuse: A Variable Deserving Critical Attention in Domestic Violence

    Article

    Policy makers and researchers give psychological abuse considerably less attention than physical abuse in the partner abuse area. One reason for the relative neglect of psychological abuse is that there are difficulties in arriving at a common definition of psychological abuse that might be useful to both the mental health and legal professions. Another reason for the relative neglect of psychological abuse has been an implicit assumption that physical abuse exacts a greater psychological toll on victims than does psychological abuse. At the extreme level of physical abuse, this assumption seems defensible, but at levels of physical aggression that are most common in marriage and long-term relationships, psychological abuse appears to have as great an impact as physical abuse. Even direct ratings of psychological and physical abuse by women in physically abusive relationships indicate that psychological abuse has a greater adverse effect on them than physical abuse. Retrospective reports, longitudinal research, and treatment dropout research all provide evidence that psychological abuse can exact a negative effect on relationships that is as great as that of physical abuse. Finally, psychological abuse almost always precedes physical abuse, so that prevention and treatment efforts clearly need to address psychological abuse. Eight measures of various forms of psychological abuse that have reasonable psychometric properties and considerable construct validity are reviewed and a definition of psychological abuse in intimate relations is provided.

    Source:
    Violence and Victims
  • How Do I Tell Thee? Voice, Pen, or Computer KeyGo to article: How Do I Tell Thee? Voice, Pen, or Computer Key

    How Do I Tell Thee? Voice, Pen, or Computer Key

    Article

    In this issue, the previous two articles by Hamby and colleagues and Vega and O’Leary are concerned with whether the method of administration and format of the Conflict Tactics Scale influence participant responses. Because they examine different aspects of the same measure, I was asked to conclude the issue by writing a brief summary and integration of the two articles.

    Source:
    Violence and Victims
  • Domestic Violence Perpetrator Programs: A Proposal for Evidence-Based Standards in the United StatesGo to article: Domestic Violence Perpetrator Programs: A Proposal for Evidence-Based Standards in the United States

    Domestic Violence Perpetrator Programs: A Proposal for Evidence-Based Standards in the United States

    Article

    In the United States, the judicial system response to violence between intimate partners, or intimate partner violence (IPV), typically mandates that adjudicated perpetrators complete a batterer intervention program (BIP). The social science data has found that these programs, on the whole, are only minimally effective in reducing rates of IPV. The authors examined the social science literature on the characteristics and efficacy of BIPs. More than 400 studies were considered, including a sweeping, recently conducted survey of BIP directors across the United States and Canada. Results of this review indicate that the limitations of BIPs are due, in large part, to the limitations of current state standards regulating these programs and, furthermore, that these standards are not grounded in the body of empirical research evidence or best practices. The authors, all of whom have considerable expertise in the area of domestic violence perpetrator treatment, conducted an exhaustive investigation of the following key intervention areas: overall effectiveness of BIPs; length of treatment/length of group sessions; number of group participants and number of facilitators; group format and curriculum; assessment protocol and instruments; victim contact; modality of treatment; differential treatment; working with female perpetrators; working with perpetrators in racial and ethnic minority groups; working with lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) perpetrators; perpetrator treatment and practitioner–client relationships; and required practitioner education and training. Recommendations for evidence-based national BIP standards were made based on findings from this review.

    Source:
    Partner Abuse
  • Major Depressive Disorder and Depressive Symptomatology as Predictors of Husband to Wife Physical AggressionGo to article: Major Depressive Disorder and Depressive Symptomatology as Predictors of Husband to Wife Physical Aggression

    Major Depressive Disorder and Depressive Symptomatology as Predictors of Husband to Wife Physical Aggression

    Article

    This study investigated the association between a husband’s depressive symptomatology and the frequency of physical aggression toward his wife, as well as a husband’s Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and the frequency of physical aggression toward his wife. We assessed physically aggressive men who volunteered for treatment with their wives (N = 89). Almost one third had moderate levels of depressive symptomatology (Beck Depression Inventory [BDI ≥ 14]), but only 11% met criteria for MDD (based on a structured interview [SCID]). Although the rate of MDD was not absolutely high, it was higher than that reported in a community sample (i.e., 3%). A significant relationship between increased depressive symptomatology and frequency of physical aggression was found, but the association was most likely accounted for by self-reported anger. Related contextual factors including marital discord and psychological aggression are addressed. Theoretical and treatment implications are discussed, including the severity of the treatment population (volunteer vs. court mandated), and severity of the depression (symptomatology vs. clinical diagnosis).

    Source:
    Violence and Victims
  • High School Students’ Responses to Dating AggressionGo to article: High School Students’ Responses to Dating Aggression

    High School Students’ Responses to Dating Aggression

    Article

    The purpose of this study was to identify high school students’ actions in response to physical aggression in their dating relationships. The association of these actions with race/ethnicity and gender was also examined. From a sample of high school students (N = 476), a subsample who reported that they had experienced at least one episode of being victimized by physical aggression in a dating relationship (n = 183), served as the sample of interest. On average, students engaged in two help-seeking actions, with females reporting more actions than males. Overall, the most common responses to physical aggression in a dating relationship were aggressive action (e.g., fight back), informal help seeking, threatened or actual breakup, and doing nothing (males) or crying (females). Females were more likely to fight back than were males. Race was largely unrelated to students’ actions. Intervention opportunities and areas for future research are discussed.

    Source:
    Violence and Victims

Pagination

  • Current page 1
  • Page 2
  • Next page ››
  • Last page Last »
Show 10 | 50 | 100 per page
  • Springer Publishing Company

Our content

  • Books
  • Journals
  • Reference

Information for

  • Students
  • Educators
  • Institutions
  • Authors
  • Societies
  • Advertisers

Company info

  • About
  • Help
  • Permissions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use

© 2022 Springer Publishing Company

Loading