Research Article

in

What Has EMDR Taught Us About the Psychological Characteristics of Tinnitus Patients?

Advertisement

Abstract

Tinnitus is a common and distressing symptom affecting at least 10% of the population. It is poorly understood. There are many proposed therapies but a significant lack of well-controlled trials. This study is a secondary analysis from our recent study to determine the effectiveness of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy as a treatment for tinnitus. It was designed as a single-site prospective interventional clinical trial and took place at a teaching hospital in the United Kingdom. Participants received a maximum of 10 sessions of EMDR. The EMDR used was a bespoke protocol: EMDR-for-tinnitus protocol (tEMDR). Outcome measures included evidence-based tinnitus and mood questionnaires recorded at baseline, discharge, and at 6 months post-discharge. The main outcome measure was the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, and scores demonstrated a statistically significant improvement. Secondary analyses conducted indicate statistically significant improvement for tinnitus patients with and without probable posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnoses. There was no significant decrease in depression and anxiety measures, however these were at the minimal range at the start. The purpose of this article is to describe the rationale behind the use of EMDR in tinnitus, the process of administrating a bespoke EMDR protocol, and the differences between tinnitus sufferers with differing experiences of trauma. To date our study is one of only two published studies investigating the use of EMDR for tinnitus; we therefore introduce an evolving and exciting application for EMDR therapy.

Tables

TABLE 1.
Pathway 1 and 2 Results
Pathway
Outcome1

N = Median

(IQ)
2 (2 and 3)

N = Median

(IQ)
THI
T0N = 7 60 (55–69)N = 7 65 (43–84)
T1N = 7 37 (32–54)N = 7 38 (3449)
T6N = 7 35 (30–46)N = 7 46 (33–58)
BDI
T0N = 7 14 (4–17)N = 7 12 (8–19)
T1N = 7 8 (0–9)N = 7 5 (1–13)
T6N = 7 4 (0–8)N = 7 9 (2–14)
BAI
T0N = 4 7 (1.5–18)N = 3 6 (4–10)
T1N = 3 7 (3–11)N = 3 2 (1–8)
T6N = 4 5.5 (2–7.5)N = 2 6.5 (3–10)

Note. BAI = Beck Anxiety Inventory; BDI = Beck Depression Inventory; THI = Tinnitus Handicap Inventory.

View in Context
TABLE 2.
Entire Sample
Mean (SD)
Age57 (12.4)
Gender
 Female7 (50%)
 Male7 (50%)
OutcomeMedian (IQ)Decrease from T0P-valueaPercentage greater than 20-point decrease
THI
 T062.5 (54 to 72)
 T137.5 (34 to 49)20 (16 to 35)0.00058 (57.1%) 17% to 71%
T638.5 (32 to 46)24 (11 to 30)0.00099 (64.3%) 11% to 61%
BDI
 T013.5 (7.5 to 18.5)
 T16.5 (1.0 to 11.0)7.0 (0 to 11)0.0098
 T66.0 (1.0 to 13.0)6.5 (0 to 10)0.0054
BAI
 T06 (2 to 12)
 T15 (2 to 8)3.5 (2 to 5)0.0625
 T65.5 (3.0 to 8.0)1.5 (0 to 4)0.3125

Note. BAI = Beck Anxiety Inventory; BDI = Beck Depression Inventory; THI = Tinnitus Handicap Inventory.

a Wilcoxon signed rank test.

View in Context
Article usage
Article Usage
Period Abstract Full PDF Total
Apr 2024 10 13 6 29
Mar 2024 24 14 2 40
Feb 2024 13 35 3 51
Jan 2024 38 15 4 57
Dec 2023 21 6 1 28
Nov 2023 19 11 7 37
Oct 2023 21 15 4 40
Sep 2023 36 3 1 40
Aug 2023 11 9 4 24
Jul 2023 28 14 2 44
Jun 2023 16 19 1 36
May 2023 31 8 5 44
Apr 2023 9 16 4 29
Mar 2023 15 22 6 43
Feb 2023 23 20 11 54
Jan 2023 7 8 3 18
Dec 2022 43 10 4 57
Nov 2022 33 8 5 46
Oct 2022 25 14 4 43
Sep 2022 30 15 4 49
Aug 2022 21 5 2 28
Jul 2022 25 8 4 37
Jun 2022 33 11 4 48
May 2022 30 5 2 37
Apr 2022 16 11 2 29
Mar 2022 33 11 2 46
Feb 2022 23 7 4 34
Jan 2022 19 6 1 26
Dec 2021 24 11 3 38
Nov 2021 24 1 1 26
Oct 2021 25 2 3 30
Sep 2021 26 3 3 32
Aug 2021 10 0 4 14
Jul 2021 18 2 2 22
Jun 2021 107 10 3 120
May 2021 51 10 9 70
Apr 2021 77 16 16 109
Mar 2021 364 18 11 393
Feb 2021 1581 17 15 1613
Jan 2021 1791 20 9 1820
Dec 2020 1643 28 31 1702
Nov 2020 981 46 40 1067