Research Article

in

Two-Spirit Identity and Indigenous Conceptualization of Gender and Sexuality: Implications for Nursing Practice

Advertisement

Abstract

The word Two-Spirit is an umbrella term that is used to describe Indigenous peoples who are diverse in terms of their sexual orientation and gender identity, though community-specific definitions and roles for gender and sexual orientation are more extensive and varied. While the terminology of Two-Spirit is recent in its development, Indigenous conceptualizations of diverse gender identities, roles, and sexual orientations have existed since time immemorial and provide important insights into how cultural safety can be incorporated into caring practices. The purpose of this article is to introduce readers to the term Two-Spirit and to provide a broad overview of Indigenous conceptualizations of gender, sexuality, and spirit, to address implications for the nursing profession, and to outline potential applications of this knowledge in practice.

When engaging in community-based work and research with Indigenous peoples, researchers are encouraged to position themselves by defining their positionality and worldview. This allows community members and others to understand the intent and motivation of researchers who are seeking knowledge (Kovach, 2009; Lavallée, 2009). It also attends to the situated nature of knowledge production, which is imperative within the context of relationships that are grounded in power imbalances, such as those between researcher and researched individuals, groups, and/or communities (Caretta, 2015). The first author (LC) is a Two-Spirit Niitsítapi (Blackfoot) RN and doctoral student at Dalhousie University. She recognizes the role of place and land on learning and promoting culturally safe care within nursing and health care more broadly. As such, her understanding of Two-Spirit identity is influenced by her upbringing and lived experience as a Niitsítapi woman and her learning as a guest in Mi'kmaki (the traditional and unceded land of the Mi'kmaq people) for the past decade. The second author (JD) is a Two-Spirit Métis RN and graduate student at the University of British Columbia. In addition to his lived experience, he provides knowledge and expertise in this area as he practices as a nurse in a queer men's health clinic in Vancouver, British Columbia. The third author (JL) is a White lesbian RN and doctoral student at Dalhousie University. She is a recognized ally to Indigenous peoples and speaks to the experiences of non-Indigenous nurses working with diverse genders and sexual orientations across cultures.

BACKGROUND

Within North America and internationally, the colonization of Indigenous peoples is recognized as a key determinant of health, profoundly affecting the health and well-being of Indigenous communities (Allan & Smylie, 2015). Colonial action and oppression resulted in the degradation of traditional practices and language, a loss of connection to the land, and a massive decrease in the population of Indigenous peoples (Aboriginal Nurses Association of Canada, 2009; Allan & Smylie, 2015). This devastating colonial history, its modern reiterations, and intergenerational sequelae have a deep impact on Indigenous peoples and their cultures, which has a direct impact on their health status and well-being (Mowbray, 2007). This effect can be observed when considering the social construction of gender and sexuality among Indigenous peoples and can be applied in such a way that furthers understandings around culturally safe care. Genocide and colonization oppressed and negated Indigenous understandings of gender and sexuality (Hunt, 2016). Through the cultural oppression of Indigenous peoples, Western understanding and social performance of gender and sexuality were forced onto Indigenous communities, challenging pre-contact views and understanding of gender roles and sexual identity (CBC News, 2015; Robinson, 2017; Sheppard & Mayo, 2013). Gilley (2006) and Robinson (2019) state that as a result of enculturation with Western values and Christianity, there are modern constructions of Indigenous gender roles that ascribe to a gender binary and reject variations in gender expression and sexual orientation. As a result, Indigenous individuals who are gender diverse or have a non-heterosexual sexual orientation may be aligned with traditional values and beliefs from their culture, but still experience homophobia or marginalization within their communities (Garrett & Barret, 2003; Robinson, 2019; Sheppard & Mayo, 2013). This marginalization is compounded by other forms of oppression that Two-Spirit individuals may face from outside their communities, such as racism and high rates of poverty.

Through the cultural oppression of Indigenous peoples, Western understanding and social performance of gender and sexuality were forced onto Indigenous communities, challenging pre-contact views and understanding of gender roles and sexual identity.

Despite challenges that exist, Indigenous peoples and Two-Spirit individuals are incredibly resilient, and there is a movement in many communities to explore traditional cultural practices around gender and sexual orientations or, in some cases, to create language and terminology to embrace gender-diverse community members. For example, the word Two-Spirit was conceptualized in 1990 at the Native American/First Nations Gay and Lesbian Conference in Winnipeg, Manitoba (Deschamps & 2-Spirited People of the 1st Nations, 1998; Hunt, 2016). This term was created in order to replace colonially defined and imposed terms for diverse sexual orientations and gender identities (Deschamps & 2-Spirited People of the 1st Nations, 1998; Hunt, 2016; Robinson, 2019). Since the 1990s, the term Two-Spirit has been used by Indigenous peoples to describe identities that define, describe, and complicate gender, sexuality, and sex (Hunt, 2016). Two-Spirit is broadly defined as an Indigenous person who has both feminine and masculine spirits residing in their body (Sheppard & Mayo, 2013). However, a consistent theme in existing literature and community member accounts about Two-Spirit identity is that it is multi-faceted, fluid, and cannot be reduced to a universal definition (Hunt, 2016; Robinson, 2017; Sheppard & Mayo, 2013). Such a reduction would fail to account for community-specific conceptualizations and understandings of gender, sexuality, and spirit (Robinson, 2017). Although Two-Spirit is commonly used as an umbrella term to encapsulate Indigenous gender-diverse and non-normative sexual orientations, there is great diversity among Indigenous peoples across Turtle Island (North America) and worldwide. This is reflected in how nations and communities conceptualize gender, gender roles, and sexual orientation, as well as the terms used in traditional languages to describe these concepts.

Robinson (2017) states that Two-Spirit identity goes beyond gender and sexuality. Rather, Two-Spirit refers to a person's whole self and informs their entire identity (Robinson, 2017). That is, the Two-Spirit experience is a lens through which a person interprets the world; this lens has a profound impact on one's daily life (Driskill, Finley, & Gilley, 2011; Robinson, 2017). Many Indigenous communities worldwide acknowledge greater variation in gender identity than the widely accepted Western gender binary (Robinson, 2017; Sheppard & Mayo, 2013). In many nations, Two-Spirit people are revered, and occupy important and respected roles in the social structures of communities (Sheppard & Mayo, 2013). For example, in some communities Two-Spirit individuals have specific duties to perform and serve as healers, medicine people, or spiritual leaders (Deschamps & 2-Spirited People of the 1st Nations, 1998).

NURSING CONSIDERATIONS

The care received by Two-Spirit patients in the clinical setting is deeply affected by the assumptions of nurses and other health professionals, which can lead to both conscious and unconscious discrimination. Research suggests that Two-Spirit individuals and other members of the LGBTQ+ community experience discomfort in sharing information with their health-care team due to previous experiences of discrimination when accessing care (Fenge & Hicks, 2011; Pettinato, 2012). In addition, Two-Spirit individuals may experience barriers in accessing safe care, which can result in treatment being delayed or not sought out at all. Nurses have an opportunity to work with Two-Spirit people to improve health-care experiences and health outcomes by addressing their assumptions and working to dismantle systemic barriers that impact the care of this population.

It is important for nurses to consider the mistrust that stems from the racism and stigmatization that is uniquely experienced by Indigenous populations, if their goal is to deliver culturally safe care to Two-Spirit patients. Patients and families may experience ongoing intergenerational trauma as a result of racist and genocidal government policies, Indian Residential Schools (Canada) or boarding schools (United States), and the forced removal of children in the Sixties and Eighties Scoops (Daschuk, 2014). These experiences have a profound effect on health-seeking behaviors and can influence how community members access health care. In addition, the previous experiences of a person or their family member in the health-care setting will have an impact on how they feel when seeking health care. Many Indigenous peoples report racism and negative care experiences in the health-care system, and this discrimination can be compounded further for patients who are Two-Spirit, as they may encounter homophobia or be forced to enter unsafe spaces in order to receive care. It is paramount that nurses recognize the systemic barriers and racist policies that exist for Indigenous peoples seeking care, and work to critically examine their own nursing practice and institutional settings to mitigate these concerns. Consideration should also be given to how failure to develop policies that specifically attend to the unique barriers that Indigenous peoples experience in health care contributes to the denial of the injustices that negatively impact Indigenous health outcomes.

Another point of reflection for nurses working with Two-Spirit peoples is understanding the history of colonization and its impact on the health of Indigenous peoples. Nurses have an opportunity to enhance the therapeutic relationship by learning about local Indigenous communities where they practice, including local conceptualizations and words for gender and sexual orientation. Through learning about local Indigenous cultures and developing a baseline of knowledge, nurses can demonstrate cultural safety by fostering feelings of welcomeness and dismantling stress for Two-Spirit and other Indigenous patients. It is also key to recognize that many Indigenous people are affected by intergenerational trauma due to colonial processes such as residential or boarding school, day school, forced relocation, and high rates of apprehension of children by child protective services to be placed with non-Indigenous families. A trauma-informed approach to care is thus necessary to promote culturally safe environments when working with patients and families who have experienced these events.

In order to provide the best care to Two-Spirit patients, nurses must understand intersecting forms of oppression and their impact on holistic health. This involves recognizing diversity among Two-Spirit peoples and understanding that the experiences and care needs of patients are never exactly alike. It is imperative for nurses to practice in a person-centered manner, determining the needs of the individual in their care. This may involve asking the patient if they are comfortable with sharing how they identify, what their preferred pronouns are, and any other information they feel is important about their nation or community. Creating a safe environment for these conversations is key to ensuring that the patient has safe and supportive health care. Assumptions are an important factor to remember; not all Indigenous LGBTQ+ peoples identify with the Two-Spirit concept. For example, it should not be assumed that one who identifies as Indigenous and gay is Two-Spirit; they may prefer to use a word from their Indigenous language, or may use a Western descriptor for their gender or sexuality. Maintaining an open mind and being willing to learn about different patients, communities, and understandings of gender and sexuality will enable nurses to provide more equitable and culturally safe care.

Nurses have an opportunity to enhance the therapeutic relationship by learning about local Indigenous communities where they practice, including local conceptualizations and words for gender and sexual orientation.

CONCLUSION

Two-Spirit is a word that implies a person has both a masculine and feminine spirit within their body. This word is often used as an overarching term for Indigenous people who are gender diverse or are members of the LGBTQ+ communities. However, individual nations or communities may have their own language and conceptualizations of gender and sexuality, so it is not advisable for nurses to utilizea universal definition of Two-Spirit when working with this population. Two-Spirit patients experience oppression within health-care settings and in general society, but this population is resilient and vibrant. Many Indigenous communities are working to reestablish traditions around diverse genders and sexual orientations, as these practices were often eradicated or severely altered by colonial processes. Nurses who wish to operate in solidarity with Indigenous populations need to demonstrate competencies in providing culturally safe care. When working with Two-Spirit patients, nurses must examine and address their own assumptions and biases about Indigenous peoples and to dismantle barriers that exist for these patients when accessing health care. Further, nurses can improve their knowledge of Indigenous history and traditions in their local communities, which will allow for enhanced therapeutic relationships. By understanding the impact of colonization on this population and how determinants of health intersect to create health inequities, nurses can better refine approaches to patient care that address the unique needs of Two-Spirit patients in the clinical setting.

REFERENCES

  1. Aboriginal Nurses Association of Canada. (2009). Cultural competence and cultural safety in frist nations, inuit and métis nursing education. Retrieved from http://casn.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/FINALReviewofLiterature.pdf
  2. Allan, B., & Smylie, J. (2015). First Peoples, second class treatment: The role of racism in the health and well-being of Indigenous peoples in Canada. Toronto, ON, Canada: Wellesley Institute.
  3. Caretta, M. A. (2015). Situated knowledge in cross-cultural, cross-language research: Acollaborative reflexive analysis of researcher, assistant and participant subjectivities. Qualitative Research, 15(4), 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794114543404
  4. CBC News. (2015, January 9). Harlan Pruden finds healing for LGBT First Nations in tradition. CBC News (The Early Edition). Retrieved from http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/harlan-pruden-finds-healing-for-lgbt-first-nations-intradition-1.2894254
  5. Daschuk, J. (2014). Clearing the plains: Disease, politics of starvation, and the loss of indigenous life. Regina, SK: University of Regina Press.
  6. Deschamps, G., & 2-Spirited People of the 1st Nations. (1998). We are part of tradition: A guide on two-spirited people for first nation communities [PDF]. Retrieved from http://www.2spirits.com/PDFolder/WeArePartOfTradition.pdf
  7. Driskill, Q.-L., Finley, C., Gilley, B. J., & Morgensen, S. L. (Eds.). (2011). Queer indigenous studies: Critical interventions in theory, politics, and literature. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
  8. Fenge, L., & Hicks, C. (2011). Hidden lives: The importance of recognizing the needs and experiences of older lesbians and gay men within healthcare practice. Diversity in Health and Care, 8(3), 147–154.
  9. Garrett, M. T., & Barret, B. (2003). Two spirit: Counseling native american gay, lesbian, and bisexual people. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 31(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1912.2003.tb00538.x
  10. Gilley, B. (2006). Becoming two-spirit: Gay identity and social acceptance in Indian country. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
  11. Hunt, S. (2016). An Introduction to the health of two-spirit people: Historical, contemporary, and emergent issues. Prince George, BC: National Collaborating Centre for Aboriginal Health.
  12. Kovach, M. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  13. Lavallée, L. (2009). Practical application of an Indigenous research framework and two qualitative Indigenous research methods: Sharing circles and Anishnaabe symbol-based reflection. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 21–40. doi: 10.1177/16094069090080010
  14. Mowbray, M. (Ed.). (2007). Social determinants and indigenous health: The international experience and its policy implications. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization Commission on Social Determinants of Health.
  15. Pettinato, M. (2012). Providing care for GLBTQ patients. Nursing, 42(12), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NURSE.0000422641.75759.d7
  16. Robinson, M. (2017). Two-Spirit and bisexual people: Different umbrella, same rain. Journal of Bisexuality, 17(1), 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2016.1261266
  17. Robinson, M. (2019). Two-Spirit identity in a time of gender fluidity. Journal of Homosexuality, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2019.1613853
  18. Sheppard, M., & Mayo, J.B. (2013). The social construction of gender and sexuality: Learning from two spirit traditions. The Social Studies, 104, 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2013.788472

Disclosure

The authors have no relevant financial interest or affiliations with any commercial interests related to the subjects discussed within this article.

Acknowledgments

The research of Leah Carrier is supported by funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Research Nova Scotia, the Canadian Nurses Foundation, the Canadian Federation of University Women, and BRIC-NS. Jessy Dame has received funding from Indspire and the Canadian Nurses Foundation. Jennifer Lane has received additional funding from Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Research Nova Scotia, NSGS, Dalhousie School of Nursing, and Nova Scotia Health Authority (NSHA).

Funding

The author(s) received no specific grant or financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Article usage
Article Usage
Period Abstract Full PDF Total
Feb 2025 61 6 5 72
Jan 2025 82 21 0 103
Dec 2024 6 31 3 40
Nov 2024 0 8 7 15
Oct 2024 4 14 4 22
Sep 2024 3 8 1 12
Aug 2024 167 9 2 178
Jul 2024 1 8 0 9
Jun 2024 2 11 2 15
May 2024 67 9 4 80
Apr 2024 9 4 3 16
Mar 2024 8 14 3 25
Feb 2024 19 27 11 57
Jan 2024 8 29 3 40
Dec 2023 20 13 10 43
Nov 2023 22 22 8 52
Oct 2023 17 25 18 60
Sep 2023 14 14 9 37
Aug 2023 59 2 3 64
Jul 2023 252 32 2 286
Jun 2023 3 290 26 319
May 2023 134 70 16 220
Apr 2023 677 74 13 764
Mar 2023 691 104 33 828
Feb 2023 100 69 19 188
Jan 2023 12 76 25 113
Dec 2022 18 38 16 72
Nov 2022 86 1 4 91
Oct 2022 147 39 21 207
Sep 2022 660 40 14 714
Aug 2022 685 21 21 727
Jul 2022 421 45 17 483
Jun 2022 12 111 30 153
May 2022 26 58 29 113
Apr 2022 17 33 19 69
Mar 2022 16 36 20 72
Feb 2022 19 26 16 61
Jan 2022 97 42 13 152
Dec 2021 435 20 9 464
Nov 2021 156 121 33 310
Oct 2021 526 52 21 599
Sep 2021 13 54 19 86
Aug 2021 80 22 11 113
Jul 2021 556 24 19 599
Jun 2021 477 80 19 576
May 2021 16 71 11 98
Apr 2021 135 5 4 144
Mar 2021 95 4 1 100
Feb 2021 79 4 0 83
Jan 2021 80 0 0 80
Dec 2020 64 1 2 67
Nov 2020 100 2 1 103
Oct 2020 47 2 5 54
Sep 2020 60 2 2 64
Aug 2020 76 4 2 82
Jul 2020 87 0 0 87
Jun 2020 78 4 7 89
May 2020 218 7 7 232
Apr 2020 599 0 0 599